
GeForce 9600 GS vs Quadro 3000M

GeForce 9600 GS
Popular choices:

Quadro 3000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 3000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 3000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 255% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (2 GB vs 768 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9600 GS.
| Insight | GeForce 9600 GS | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-255%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+255%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 3000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600 GS and Quadro 3000M

GeForce 9600 GS
The GeForce 9600 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 282 points.

Quadro 3000M
The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9600 GS scores 282 versus the Quadro 3000M's 1,001 — the Quadro 3000M leads by 255%. The GeForce 9600 GS is built on G9x while the Quadro 3000M uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600 GS) vs 240 (Quadro 3000M).
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 282 | 1,001+255% |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9600 GS comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 3000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 3000M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB | 2 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600 GS draws 150W versus the Quadro 3000M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro 3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600 GS) vs 350W (Quadro 3000M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 13.3+600% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 3000M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9600 GS | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GF104 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | February 22 2011 |
| Ranking | #825 | #888 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















