Phenom X4 9650
VS
Celeron G1840

Phenom X4 9650 vs Celeron G1840

AMD

Phenom X4 9650

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron G1840

2 Cores2 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9650 is positioned at rank 362 and the Celeron G1840 is on rank 420, so the Phenom X4 9650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9650

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5263%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4973%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3611%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1088%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
862%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
754%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
432%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
426%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
388%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
388%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
384%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
373%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
368%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
367%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
363%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
99%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
98%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
95%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#362
Phenom X4 9650
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#365
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
100%
#366
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6116%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5779%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4196%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1264%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
876%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
495%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
451%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
451%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
434%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
428%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
426%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
422%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
97%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
96%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
100%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
98%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
98%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1840 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPhenom X4 9650Celeron G1840
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9650 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPhenom X4 9650Celeron G1840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9650 and Celeron G1840

AMD

Phenom X4 9650

The Phenom X4 9650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,777 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9650 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1840 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9650 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840. The Phenom X4 9650 uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9650 scores 1,777 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1840. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9650 vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1840.

FeaturePhenom X4 9650Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,777
1,784
Geekbench 6 Single
488
Geekbench 6 Multi
832
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9650 uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9650Celeron G1840
Socket
AM2+
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9650) / VT-x (Celeron G1840). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom X4 9650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

FeaturePhenom X4 9650Celeron G1840
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget