Phenom X4 9750B
VS
Celeron N4020

Phenom X4 9750B vs Celeron N4020

AMD

Phenom X4 9750B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron N4020

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9750B is positioned at rank 1047 and the Celeron N4020 is on rank 993, so the Celeron N4020 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9750B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
44090%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
41661%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
30249%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9113%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7218%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6315%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3617%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3569%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3250%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3250%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3213%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3127%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3083%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3071%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3043%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
100%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
99%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
99%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
97%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
97%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
96%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
96%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
95%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
94%
#1056
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
94%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
93%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
92%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
91%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
90%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
90%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4020

#981
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2045%
#982
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2015%
#983
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1849%
#984
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1841%
#985
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1824%
#987
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1762%
#988
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1689%
#989
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1686%
#990
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1641%
#993
Celeron N4020
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
100%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
100%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
98%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
98%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
95%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4020 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPhenom X4 9750BCeleron N4020
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($34)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9750B (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPhenom X4 9750BCeleron N4020
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($34)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9750B and Celeron N4020

AMD

Phenom X4 9750B

The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron N4020

The Celeron N4020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,535 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9750B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4020 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N4020. The Phenom X4 9750B uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N4020 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9750B scores 1,520 against the Celeron N4020's 1,535 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N4020. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4020.

FeaturePhenom X4 9750BCeleron N4020
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
4 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4 MB+700%
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
PassMark
1,520
1,535
Geekbench 6 Single
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9750B uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N4020 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9750BCeleron N4020
Socket
AM2+
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B) / not specified (Celeron N4020). Primary use case: Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop.

FeaturePhenom X4 9750BCeleron N4020
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop