Phenom X4 9750B vs Core i3-530
Phenom X4 9750B
Core i3-530
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9750B is positioned at rank 1047 and the Core i3-530 is on rank 933, so the Core i3-530 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9750B
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-530
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom X4 9750B | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($34) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom X4 9750B | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+126%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($34) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9750B and Core i3-530
Phenom X4 9750B
The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i3-530
The Core i3-530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,516 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Phenom X4 9750B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-530 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B versus 0.93 GHz on the Core i3-530 — a 88.3% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B. The Phenom X4 9750B uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-530 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9750B scores 1,520 against the Core i3-530's 1,516 — a 0.3% lead for the Phenom X4 9750B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-530.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9750B | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+158% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.93 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Agena (2007−2008) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,520 | 1,516 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom X4 9750B uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-530 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9750B | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2+ | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B) / not specified (Core i3-530). Primary use case: Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9750B | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Phenom X4 9750B launched at $215 MSRP, while the Core i3-530 debuted at $113. At current prices ($34 vs $15), the Core i3-530 is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom X4 9750B delivers 44.7 pts/$ vs 101.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-530 — making the Core i3-530 the 77.3% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom X4 9750B | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $215 | $113-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $34 | $15-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.7 | 101.1+126% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom X4 9750B and Core i3-530
