PRO A10-8770
VS
Core i7-2635QM

PRO A10-8770 vs Core i7-2635QM

AMD

PRO A10-8770

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-2635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A10-8770 is positioned at rank 300 and the Core i7-2635QM is on rank 1096, so the PRO A10-8770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-8770

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4394%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4152%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3015%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
908%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
719%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
629%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
360%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
324%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
324%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
320%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
312%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
307%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
306%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
303%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
100%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
99%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
99%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
99%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
98%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
98%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
97%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
97%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
97%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
96%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
95%
#300
PRO A10-8770
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#312
Phenom II X4 810
MSRP: $175|Avg: N/A
96%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2635QM

#1084
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3131%
#1085
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3085%
#1086
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2832%
#1087
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2820%
#1088
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2794%
#1090
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2698%
#1091
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2587%
#1092
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2583%
#1093
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2513%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The PRO A10-8770 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2635QM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPRO A10-8770Core i7-2635QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPRO A10-8770Core i7-2635QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-2635QM

AMD

PRO A10-8770

The PRO A10-8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,547 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The PRO A10-8770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2635QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-8770 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM — a 26.9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The PRO A10-8770 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-2635QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A10-8770 scores 3,547 against the Core i7-2635QM's 3,541 — a 0.2% lead for the PRO A10-8770.

FeaturePRO A10-8770Core i7-2635QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+31%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,547
3,541
🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A10-8770 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2635QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePRO A10-8770Core i7-2635QM
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (PRO A10-8770) / VT-x (Core i7-2635QM). The Core i7-2635QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A10-8770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile.

FeaturePRO A10-8770Core i7-2635QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile