PRO A10-8770E vs Core i7-940
PRO A10-8770E
Core i7-940
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A10-8770E is positioned at rank 1035 and the Core i7-940 is on rank 1071, so the PRO A10-8770E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-8770E
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-940
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | PRO A10-8770E | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($210) | ✅ More affordable ($90) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | PRO A10-8770E | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+136%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($210) | ✅ More affordable ($90) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of PRO A10-8770E and Core i7-940
PRO A10-8770E
The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i7-940
The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The PRO A10-8770E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-940's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 — a 9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The PRO A10-8770E uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-940 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A10-8770E scores 3,001 against the Core i7-940's 3,029 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-940.
| Feature | PRO A10-8770E | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.93 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,001 | 3,029 |
Memory & Platform
The PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-940 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | PRO A10-8770E | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 24 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 36 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (PRO A10-8770E) / VT-x (Core i7-940). Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop.
| Feature | PRO A10-8770E | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The PRO A10-8770E launched at $395 MSRP, while the Core i7-940 debuted at $562. At current prices ($210 vs $90), the Core i7-940 is $120 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the PRO A10-8770E delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 33.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-940 — making the Core i7-940 the 80.8% better value option.
| Feature | PRO A10-8770E | Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $395-30% | $562 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $210 | $90-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 33.7+136% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on PRO A10-8770E and Core i7-940
