Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VS
FirePro W4300

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs FirePro W4300

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
VS

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is positioned at rank 180 and the FirePro W4300 is on rank 168, so the FirePro W4300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
97%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
95%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
93%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
92%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
90%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
88%
#165
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2228%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
100%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#183
Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200
97%
#184
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
96%
#185
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
96%
#186
Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
95%
#188
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
94%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
92%
#191
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
92%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300

#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
99%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
98%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
97%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
94%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
93%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
90%
#153
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2060%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
100%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
100%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
98%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
97%
#176
Radeon Pro 460
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
92%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
92%
#183
Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W4300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W4300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 195.2% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E.

InsightRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-195.2%)
Leading raw performance (+195.2%)
Longevity
RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W4300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $85 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E, it costs 41% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 401.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+401.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E and FirePro W4300

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E scores 921 versus the FirePro W4300's 2,719 — the FirePro W4300 leads by 195.2%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is built on Bristol Ridge while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
G3D Mark Score
921
2,719+195%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge
GCN 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096+433%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS+3250%
1.428 TFLOPS
ROPs
128+700%
16
TMUs
256+433%
48
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4300 has 4 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E draws 300W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 142.9% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
TDP
300W
50W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
171mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
71°C
Perf/Watt
3.1
54.4+1655%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379 and now averages $50. The FirePro W4300 costs 41.2% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 54.4 (FirePro W4300) — the FirePro W4300 offers 403.7% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700EFirePro W4300
MSRP
$139-63%
$379
Avg Price (30d)
$85
$50-41%
Performance per Dollar
10.8
54.4+404%
Codename
Navi 48
Bonaire
Release
July 23 2025
December 1 2015
Ranking
#23
#590