Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Quadro 2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is positioned at rank 180 and the Quadro 2000 is on rank 314, so the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

97%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

95%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

93%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

92%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

90%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

88%

#165

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2228%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

100%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

99%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

97%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

96%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

96%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

95%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

94%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

92%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

92%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

99%

#299

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9350%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

100%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

99%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

97%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

97%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

96%

#320

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

96%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

96%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

94%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

90%

#324

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

90%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

88%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

87%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

87%

#328

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

87%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	Quadro 2000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $85 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E, it costs 71% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 250% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	Quadro 2000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+250%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85)	✅More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Benchmark Check

Quadro 2000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E and Quadro 2000

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E scores 921 and the Quadro 2000 reaches 948 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is built on Bristol Ridge while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	Quadro 2000
G3D Mark Score	921	948+3%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge	Fermi
Process Node	4 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	4096+2033%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS+9867%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	128+700%	16
TMUs	256+700%	32
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	Quadro 2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The Quadro 2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	Quadro 2000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E draws 300W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 131.5% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	Quadro 2000
TDP	300W	62W-79%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	178mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	3.1	15.3+394%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The Quadro 2000 costs 70.6% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 37.9 (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 offers 250.9% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).