PRO A10-9700 vs Xeon E5620

PRO A10-9700 vs Xeon E5620 Performance Spectrum

PRO A10-9700

4 / 4

3,600

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5620

4 / 8

3,621

+0.6%

Pentium Dual Core T3400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A10-9700 vs Xeon E5620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A10-9700 vs Xeon E5620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A10-9700

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,600 vs 3,621).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5620, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5620

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5620 better than PRO A10-9700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while PRO A10-9700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5620 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-9700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

PRO A10-9700 vs Xeon E5620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A10-9700

The PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5620's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-9700 versus 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the PRO A10-9700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The PRO A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5620 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A10-9700 scores 3,600 against the Xeon E5620's 3,621 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5620.

Feature	PRO A10-9700	Xeon E5620
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+43%	2.66 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,600	3,621

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5620 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.