
PRO A6-8570E vs Core 2 Duo SU9400

PRO A6-8570E

Core 2 Duo SU9400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A6-8570E is positioned at rank 570 and the Core 2 Duo SU9400 is on rank 409, so the Core 2 Duo SU9400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar PRO A6-8570E
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SU9400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | PRO A6-8570E | Core 2 Duo SU9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | PRO A6-8570E | Core 2 Duo SU9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of PRO A6-8570E and Core 2 Duo SU9400

PRO A6-8570E
The PRO A6-8570E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,606 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo SU9400
The Core 2 Duo SU9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,596 points. Launch price was $262.
Processing Power
Both the PRO A6-8570E and Core 2 Duo SU9400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-8570E versus 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU9400 — a 83.3% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570E (base: 3 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The PRO A6-8570E uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A6-8570E scores 1,606 against the Core 2 Duo SU9400's 1,596 — a 0.6% lead for the PRO A6-8570E.
| Feature | PRO A6-8570E | Core 2 Duo SU9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+143% | 1.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+114% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,606 | 1,596 |
Memory & Platform
The PRO A6-8570E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | PRO A6-8570E | Core 2 Duo SU9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












