PRO A6-8570E
VS
Core Duo T2500

PRO A6-8570E vs Core Duo T2500

AMD

PRO A6-8570E

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A6-8570E is positioned at rank 570 and the Core Duo T2500 is on rank 943, so the PRO A6-8570E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A6-8570E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9705%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9170%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6658%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2006%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1589%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1390%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
796%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
786%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
715%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
715%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
707%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
688%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
679%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
676%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
670%
#570
PRO A6-8570E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
100%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
100%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
100%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
99%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
99%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
98%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
98%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
98%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
97%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
97%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
97%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2500

#931
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1756%
#932
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1730%
#933
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1588%
#934
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1581%
#935
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1567%
#937
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1513%
#938
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1451%
#939
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1448%
#940
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1409%
#943
Core Duo T2500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
99%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The PRO A6-8570E (2018) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPRO A6-8570ECore Duo T2500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2500 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPRO A6-8570ECore Duo T2500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of PRO A6-8570E and Core Duo T2500

AMD

PRO A6-8570E

The PRO A6-8570E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,606 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

Both the PRO A6-8570E and Core Duo T2500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-8570E versus 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570E (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The PRO A6-8570E uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core Duo T2500 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A6-8570E scores 1,606 against the Core Duo T2500's 1,621 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Duo T2500.

FeaturePRO A6-8570ECore Duo T2500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+70%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,606
1,621
🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A6-8570E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePRO A6-8570ECore Duo T2500
Socket
AM4
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (PRO A6-8570E) / VT-x (Core Duo T2500). Primary use case: Core Duo T2500 targets Mobile.

FeaturePRO A6-8570ECore Duo T2500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile