PRO A6-9500 vs Xeon E5345

PRO A6-9500 vs Xeon E5345 Performance Spectrum

PRO A6-9500

2 / 2

1,873

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5345

4 / 4

1,868

0.0%

Core 2 Duo E7400

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A6-9500 vs Xeon E5345 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A6-9500 vs Xeon E5345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A6-9500

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5345, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5345

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,868 vs 1,873).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-9500 better than Xeon E5345?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5345 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while PRO A6-9500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A6-9500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A6-9500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-9500 still makes the most sense overall. PRO A6-9500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-9500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

PRO A6-9500 vs Xeon E5345 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A6-9500

The PRO A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,873 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5345

The Xeon E5345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,868 points. Launch price was $851.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A6-9500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5345 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5345 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-9500 versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5345 — a 168% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The PRO A6-9500 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5345 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A6-9500 scores 1,873 against the Xeon E5345's 1,868 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A6-9500.

Feature	PRO A6-9500	Xeon E5345
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+1052%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+50%	2.33 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1024 kB	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,873	1,868

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5345 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.