Core i7-2677M vs PRO A6-9500

Core i7-2677M vs PRO A6-9500 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2677M

2 / 4

1,875

+0.1%

1,873

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2677M vs PRO A6-9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2677M vs PRO A6-9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2677M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while PRO A6-9500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A6-9500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

PRO A6-9500

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,873 vs 1,875).
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2677M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2677M better than PRO A6-9500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-9500 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2677M pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2677M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2677M still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2677M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-9500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-2677M vs PRO A6-9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

PRO A6-9500

The PRO A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,873 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2677M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the PRO A6-9500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-9500 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2677M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A6-9500 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2677M scores 1,875 against the PRO A6-9500's 1,873 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-2677M.

Feature	Core i7-2677M	PRO A6-9500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1024 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,875	1,873
Geekbench 6 Single	562	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2677M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A6-9500 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2677M	PRO A6-9500
Socket	BGA1023	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M) / not specified (PRO A6-9500). The Core i7-2677M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A6-9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.