Core i7-2677M vs Turion II M500

Core i7-2677M vs Turion II M500 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-2677M

2 / 4

1,875

+0.5%

1,865

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2677M vs Turion II M500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2677M vs Turion II M500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2677M

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Turion II M500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Turion II M500

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,865 vs 1,875).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2677M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2677M better than Turion II M500?

Yes. Core i7-2677M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2677M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2677M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2677M still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2677M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-2677M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2677M vs Turion II M500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

Turion II M500

The Turion II M500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2677M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II M500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion II M500 — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2677M. The Core i7-2677M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion II M500 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2677M scores 1,875 against the Turion II M500's 1,865 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2677M.

Feature	Core i7-2677M	Turion II M500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+32%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	1,875	1,865
Geekbench 6 Single	562	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2677M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II M500 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2677M	Turion II M500
Socket	BGA1023	S1g3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M) / not specified (Turion II M500). The Core i7-2677M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion II M500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.