
Athlon II X3 450

Core i7-2677M
Athlon II X3 450 vs Core i7-2677M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X3 450 vs Core i7-2677M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X3 450 vs Core i7-2677M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X3 450
2010Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Core i7-2677M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (380 vs 562).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,865 vs 1,875).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while Core i7-2677M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌458.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 17W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2677M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2677M
2011Why buy it
- ✅+47.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 95W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon II X3 450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 450.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2677M better than Athlon II X3 450?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X3 450 vs Core i7-2677M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 450
The Athlon II X3 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $45.

Core i7-2677M
The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 450 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i7-2677M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 450 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon II X3 450 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 450 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon II X3 450 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-2677M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 450 scores 1,865 against the Core i7-2677M's 1,875 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2677M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 380 vs 562, a 38.6% lead for the Core i7-2677M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 450 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2677M.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 450 | Core i7-2677M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+10% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+78% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,865 | 1,875 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380 | 562+48% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 450 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2677M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 450 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,780G,790GX,880G,970,990FX (Athlon II X3 450) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2677M).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 450 | Core i7-2677M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 450) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M). The Core i7-2677M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II X3 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X3 450 targets Desktop, Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 450 | Core i7-2677M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Ultrabook |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















