
A6-9500

Athlon II X3 450
A6-9500 vs Athlon II X3 450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-9500 vs Athlon II X3 450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-9500 vs Athlon II X3 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-9500
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Athlon II X3 450 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($101 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 450.
Athlon II X3 450
2010Why buy it
- β Costs $14 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
- β Delivers 15.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.4 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike A6-9500.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,865 vs 1,876).
- β46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A6-9500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A6-9500 better than Athlon II X3 450?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-9500 vs Athlon II X3 450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9500
The A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $64.

Athlon II X3 450
The Athlon II X3 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009β2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $45.
Processing Power
The A6-9500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 450 offers 3 cores / 3 threads β the Athlon II X3 450 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-9500 versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon II X3 450 β a 17.1% clock advantage for the A6-9500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A6-9500 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016β2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 450 uses Rana (2009β2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9500 scores 1,876 against the Athlon II X3 450's 1,865 β a 0.6% lead for the A6-9500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-9500 | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016β2019) | Rana (2009β2011) |
| PassMark | 1,876 | 1,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 380 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 980 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 450 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 450 β the A6-9500 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9500) vs 16 (Athlon II X3 450) β the Athlon II X3 450 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (A6-9500) and 760G,780G,790GX,880G,970,990FX (Athlon II X3 450).
| Feature | A6-9500 | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+80% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (A6-9500) / AMD-V (Athlon II X3 450). The A6-9500 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Athlon II X3 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X3 450 targets Desktop.
| Feature | A6-9500 | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R5 | β |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A6-9500 was priced at $101, while the Athlon II X3 450 came in at $87. On launch pricing ($101 vs $87), Athlon II X3 450 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-9500 delivers 18.6 pts/$ vs 21.4 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 450 β making the Athlon II X3 450 the 14.3% better value option.
| Feature | A6-9500 | Athlon II X3 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $101 | $87-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | 21.4+15% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















