Pro A8-8600B
VS
Core i3-3210

Pro A8-8600B vs Core i3-3210

AMD

Pro A8-8600B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i3-3210

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pro A8-8600B is positioned at rank 986 and the Core i3-3210 is on rank 814, so the Core i3-3210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pro A8-8600B

#974
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1997%
#975
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1968%
#976
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1807%
#977
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1799%
#978
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1782%
#980
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1721%
#981
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1650%
#982
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1647%
#983
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1603%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
98%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
98%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
97%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
96%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
96%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
95%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3210

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15461%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11226%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3382%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2679%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1342%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1206%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1206%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1193%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1160%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1140%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1129%
#814
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
100%
#815
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#816
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#817
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#818
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#819
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#820
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#821
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#822
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#823
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#824
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#826
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#827
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#828
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3210 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pro A8-8600B in both compute-intensive tasks (1.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPro A8-8600BCore i3-3210
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-3210 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($25 vs $25) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPro A8-8600BCore i3-3210
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pro A8-8600B and Core i3-3210

AMD

Pro A8-8600B

The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-3210

The Core i3-3210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,229 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

The Pro A8-8600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3210 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-3210 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3210 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Pro A8-8600B uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-3210 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pro A8-8600B scores 2,203 against the Core i3-3210's 2,229 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3210.

FeaturePro A8-8600BCore i3-3210
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
3072 kB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,203
2,229+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
505
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,113
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pro A8-8600B uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3210 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePro A8-8600BCore i3-3210
Socket
FP4
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pro A8-8600B) / VT-x (Core i3-3210). The Core i3-3210 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Pro A8-8600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3210 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3210 rivals Ryzen 3 1200.

FeaturePro A8-8600BCore i3-3210
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pro A8-8600B launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i3-3210 debuted at $117. At current prices ($25 vs $25), the Core i3-3210 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pro A8-8600B delivers 88.1 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-3210 — making the Core i3-3210 the 1.2% better value option.

FeaturePro A8-8600BCore i3-3210
MSRP
$150
$117-22%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$25
Performance per Dollar
88.1
89.2+1%
Release Date
2015
2013