Pro A8-8600B vs Athlon II X3 425e
Pro A8-8600B
Athlon II X3 425e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pro A8-8600B is positioned at rank 986 and the Athlon II X3 425e is on rank 620, so the Athlon II X3 425e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pro A8-8600B
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 425e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pro A8-8600B | Athlon II X3 425e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($58) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pro A8-8600B | Athlon II X3 425e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+128%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($58) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pro A8-8600B and Athlon II X3 425e
Pro A8-8600B
The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon II X3 425e
The Athlon II X3 425e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Pro A8-8600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 425e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X3 425e — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Pro A8-8600B (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Pro A8-8600B uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 425e uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pro A8-8600B scores 2,203 against the Athlon II X3 425e's 2,239 — a 1.6% lead for the Athlon II X3 425e.
| Feature | Pro A8-8600B | Athlon II X3 425e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+33% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+11% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz+69% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,203 | 2,239+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Pro A8-8600B uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 425e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pro A8-8600B | Athlon II X3 425e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Value Analysis
The Pro A8-8600B launched at $150 MSRP, while the Athlon II X3 425e debuted at $79. At current prices ($25 vs $58), the Pro A8-8600B is $33 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pro A8-8600B delivers 88.1 pts/$ vs 38.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 425e — making the Pro A8-8600B the 78.1% better value option.
| Feature | Pro A8-8600B | Athlon II X3 425e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $79-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-57% | $58 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.1+128% | 38.6 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pro A8-8600B and Athlon II X3 425e
