CPU
GPU
Processor N100
Core i3-7320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor N100 is positioned at rank 583 and the Core i3-7320 is on rank 434, so the Core i3-7320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Processor N100
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Processor N100 | Core i3-7320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Processor N100 | Core i3-7320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+148%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor N100 and Core i3-7320
Processor N100
The Processor N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,869 points. Launch price was $128.
Core i3-7320
The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.
Processing Power
The Processor N100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7320 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Processor N100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Processor N100 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Processor N100 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-7320 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N100 scores 4,869 against the Core i3-7320's 4,831 — a 0.8% lead for the Processor N100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N100 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320.
| Feature | Processor N100 | Core i3-7320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz+4000% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,869 | 4,831 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,388 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor N100 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-7320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor N100 | Core i3-7320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Processor N100) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320). The Core i3-7320 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Processor N100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Processor N100 | Core i3-7320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Processor N100 launched at $128 MSRP, while the Core i3-7320 debuted at $99. At current prices ($100 vs $40), the Core i3-7320 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor N100 delivers 48.7 pts/$ vs 120.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-7320 — making the Core i3-7320 the 85.1% better value option.
| Feature | Processor N100 | Core i3-7320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128 | $99-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $40-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.7 | 120.8+148% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Processor N100 and Core i3-7320
