Processor N150
VS
Atom C3858

Processor N150 vs Atom C3858

Intel

Processor N150

4 Cores4 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Atom C3858

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor N150 is positioned at rank 118 and the Atom C3858 is on rank 310, so the Processor N150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor N150

#106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
292%
#107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
288%
#108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
265%
#109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
263%
#110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
261%
#112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
252%
#113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
242%
#114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
241%
#115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
235%
#118
Processor N150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#126
Celeron N4000
MSRP: $107|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3858

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4536%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
856%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
761%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
588%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
99%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
98%
#310
Atom C3858
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Processor N150 (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightProcessor N150Atom C3858
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Twin Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Atom C3858 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightProcessor N150Atom C3858
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor N150 and Atom C3858

Intel

Processor N150

The Processor N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,016 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom C3858

The Atom C3858 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

The Processor N150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3858 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Atom C3858 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Processor N150 versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3858 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Processor N150 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Atom C3858 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N150 scores 5,016 against the Atom C3858's 5,040 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom C3858. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N150 vs 12 MB on the Atom C3858.

FeatureProcessor N150Atom C3858
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
2 GHz+1900%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
12 MB+500%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
5,016
5,040
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N150 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Atom C3858 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureProcessor N150Atom C3858
Socket
FCBGA1264
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12