Processor N150 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor N150 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor N150 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor N150

2024

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1265L v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,016 vs 5,040).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1265L v2, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Processor N150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Processor N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1265L v2 better than Processor N150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Processor N150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1265L v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1265L v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1265L v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1265L v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $265 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor N150 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor N150

The Processor N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,016 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

The Xeon E3-1265L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $142.

⚡

Processing Power

The Processor N150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1265L v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Processor N150 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v2 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Processor N150 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N150 scores 5,016 against the Xeon E3-1265L v2's 5,040 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v2. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N150 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v2.

Feature	Processor N150	Xeon E3-1265L v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+2400%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Twin Lake (2024−2025)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	5,016	5,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N150 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.