Core i5-7300HQ vs Processor N150

Intel

Core i5-7300HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Processor N150

4 Cores4 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7300HQ vs Processor N150 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7300HQ vs Processor N150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7300HQ vs Processor N150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7300HQ

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Processor N150 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Processor N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N150

2024

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-7300HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,016 vs 5,077).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7300HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7300HQ better than Processor N150?
Yes. Core i5-7300HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-7300HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7300HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-7300HQ still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-7300HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-7300HQ vs Processor N150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7300HQ

The Core i5-7300HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,077 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Processor N150

The Processor N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,016 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-7300HQ and Processor N150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7300HQ versus 3.6 GHz on the Processor N150 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Processor N150 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i5-7300HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N150 uses Twin Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7300HQ scores 5,077 against the Processor N150's 5,016 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-7300HQ. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQProcessor N150
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+2400%
0.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB (total)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
5,077+1%
5,016
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7300HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N150 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQProcessor N150
Socket
BGA1440
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7300HQ) / not specified (Processor N150). The Core i5-7300HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Processor N150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7300HQ targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-7300HQProcessor N150
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile