Processor N150 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3

Intel

Processor N150

4 Cores4 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v3

4 Cores4 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Processor N150 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor N150 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor N150 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor N150

2024

Why buy it

  • +1.7% higher PassMark.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1607 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1607 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,932 vs 5,016).
  • Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Processor N150 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor N150 better than Xeon E5-1607 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Processor N150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor N150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Processor N150 still makes the most sense overall. Processor N150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor N150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor N150 vs Xeon E5-1607 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Processor N150

The Processor N150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,016 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v3

The Xeon E5-1607 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,932 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Processor N150 and Xeon E5-1607 v3 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Processor N150 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v3 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Processor N150 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N150 scores 5,016 against the Xeon E5-1607 v3's 4,932 — a 1.7% lead for the Processor N150. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N150 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v3.

FeatureProcessor N150Xeon E5-1607 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+16%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
3.1 GHz+3000%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
256K (per core)+12700%
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
5,016+2%
4,932
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N150 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureProcessor N150Xeon E5-1607 v3
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0