Processor N200 vs Celeron N5105

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Processor N200 is positioned at rank #204 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor N200

#192

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

373%

#193

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

367%

#194

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

337%

#195

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

336%

#196

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

332%

#198

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

321%

#199

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

308%

#200

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

307%

#201

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

299%

#204

Processor N200

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Processor N200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N5105 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.7% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Processor N200	Celeron N5105
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Processor N200	Celeron N5105
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Processor N200 Benchmark Check

Celeron N5105 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor N200 and Celeron N5105

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Processor N200 and Celeron N5105 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Processor N200 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron N5105 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N200 scores 3,937 against the Celeron N5105's 4,003 — a 1.7% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N200 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105.

Feature	Processor N200	Celeron N5105
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+28%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2 GHz+1900%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+33%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-N (2023)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	3,937	4,003+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N200 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron N5105 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.