Processor N200
VS
Core i5-2400

Processor N200 vs Core i5-2400

Intel

Processor N200

4 Cores4 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i5-2400

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Processor N200 is positioned at rank 204 and the Core i5-2400 is on rank 772, so the Processor N200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor N200

#192
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
373%
#193
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
367%
#194
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
337%
#195
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
336%
#196
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
332%
#198
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
321%
#199
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
308%
#200
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
307%
#201
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
299%
#204
Processor N200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14822%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14006%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10169%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3064%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2427%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2123%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1216%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1200%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1093%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1093%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1080%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1051%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1036%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1032%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1023%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
100%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
99%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
98%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
98%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Processor N200 (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightProcessor N200Core i5-2400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2400 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightProcessor N200Core i5-2400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor N200 and Core i5-2400

Intel

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

Intel

Core i5-2400

The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

Both the Processor N200 and Core i5-2400 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Processor N200 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-2400 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N200 scores 3,937 against the Core i5-2400's 3,870 — a 1.7% lead for the Processor N200. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N200 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400.

FeatureProcessor N200Core i5-2400
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+9%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
3.1 GHz+3000%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-N (2023)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,937+2%
3,870
Geekbench 6 Single
595
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N200 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-2400 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureProcessor N200Core i5-2400
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Processor N200) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400). The Core i5-2400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Processor N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.

FeatureProcessor N200Core i5-2400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop