Processor N200 vs Xeon E3-1225

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Processor N200 vs Xeon E3-1225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Processor N200 vs Xeon E3-1225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Processor N200

2023

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E3-1225

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,903 vs 3,937).
❌Launch MSRP is still $224 MSRP, while Processor N200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Processor N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Processor N200 better than Xeon E3-1225?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Processor N200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Processor N200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor N200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Processor N200 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1225 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Processor N200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $224 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1225 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Processor N200 vs Xeon E3-1225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

Xeon E3-1225

The Xeon E3-1225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,903 points. Launch price was $150.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Processor N200 and Xeon E3-1225 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Processor N200 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N200 scores 3,937 against the Xeon E3-1225's 3,903 — a 0.9% lead for the Processor N200. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Processor N200	Xeon E3-1225
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	3.1 GHz+3000%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-N (2023)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,937	3,903

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor N200 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.