Celeron N5105 vs Processor N200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5105 vs Processor N200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5105 vs Processor N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5105

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Older platform position on BGA1338 with DDR4, while Processor N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N200

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1338 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,937 vs 4,003).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5105 better than Processor N200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Processor N200 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Processor N200 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5105 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N5105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1338, and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron N5105 vs Processor N200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 2 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Celeron N5105 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Processor N200 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Processor N200's 3,937 — a 1.7% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N200.

Feature	Celeron N5105	Processor N200
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.7 GHz+28%
Base Clock	2 GHz+1900%	0.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	2 MB (total)+33%
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	4,003+2%	3,937

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5105 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Processor N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.