Celeron N5105
VS
Core i7-7660U

Celeron N5105 vs Core i7-7660U

Intel

Celeron N5105

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i7-7660U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7660U

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
99%
#538
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
723%
#539
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
712%
#540
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
654%
#541
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
651%
#542
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
645%
#544
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
623%
#545
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
597%
#546
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
596%
#547
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
580%
#550
Core i7-7660U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-7660U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N5105 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron N5105Core i7-7660U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N5105Core i7-7660U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5105 and Core i7-7660U

Intel

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-7660U

The Core i7-7660U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,059 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The Celeron N5105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-7660U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7660U — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-7660U (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron N5105 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-7660U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Core i7-7660U's 4,059 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-7660U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7660U.

FeatureCeleron N5105Core i7-7660U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB (total)+200%
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,003
4,059+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,759
Geekbench 6 Single
1,150
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,285
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5105 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-7660U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5105Core i7-7660U
Socket
BGA1338
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5105) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7660U). The Core i7-7660U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus 640), while the Celeron N5105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7660U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-7660U rivals Core i5-8250U.

FeatureCeleron N5105Core i7-7660U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus 640
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Productivity