Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-3340S

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-3340S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-3340S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5105

2021

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3340S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i5-3340S

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,962 vs 4,003).
❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Celeron N5105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5105 better than Core i5-3340S?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-3340S is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Core i5-3340S also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5105 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N5105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. Core i5-3340S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-3340S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3340S

The Core i5-3340S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,962 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5105 and Core i5-3340S share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340S — a 12.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340S (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron N5105 is built on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Core i5-3340S's 3,962 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340S.

Feature	Celeron N5105	Core i5-3340S
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	—
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	—
PassMark	4,003+1%	3,962

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5105 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-3340S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.