Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-6098P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-6098P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-6098P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5105

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 54W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-6098P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6098P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-6098P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 510, while Celeron N5105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,978 vs 4,003).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Celeron N5105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌440% higher power demand at 54W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5105 better than Core i3-6098P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-6098P is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Celeron N5105 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5105 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N5105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Core i3-6098P only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-6098P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-6098P

The Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,978 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6098P offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-6098P — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-6098P (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron N5105 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-6098P uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Core i3-6098P's 3,978 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6098P.

Feature	Celeron N5105	Core i3-6098P
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)+200%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	4,003	3,978

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5105 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-6098P uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N5105	Core i3-6098P
Socket	BGA1338	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	64
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5105) / true (Core i3-6098P). The Core i3-6098P includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Celeron N5105 requires a dedicated GPU.