Core i7-2675QM vs Processor N200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2675QM vs Processor N200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2675QM vs Processor N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2675QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Processor N200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,937).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Processor N200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1224, while Processor N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N200

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1224 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2675QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2675QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2675QM better than Processor N200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2675QM is ahead with a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor N200 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor N200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2675QM is the better buy right now. Core i7-2675QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Processor N200 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1224, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-2675QM vs Processor N200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2675QM

The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.

Processor N200

The Processor N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,937 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2675QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Processor N200's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM versus 3.7 GHz on the Processor N200 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Processor N200 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i7-2675QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Processor N200 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2675QM scores 3,913 against the Processor N200's 3,937 — a 0.6% lead for the Processor N200. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-2675QM	Processor N200
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+2100%	0.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	3,913	3,937

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2675QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Processor N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2675QM	Processor N200
Socket	FCBGA1224	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2675QM) / not specified (Processor N200). The Core i7-2675QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Processor N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.