CPU
GPU
Core i3-7101TE
Core i7-2675QM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7101TE is positioned at rank 552 and the Core i7-2675QM is on rank 1070, so the Core i3-7101TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101TE
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2675QM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7101TE | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7101TE | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+537%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7101TE and Core i7-2675QM
Core i3-7101TE
The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.
Core i7-2675QM
The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7101TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2675QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2675QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101TE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-7101TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2675QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7101TE scores 3,956 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-7101TE. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7101TE vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,956+1% | 3,913 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,188 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,368 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7101TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101TE versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2675QM — the Core i3-7101TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7101TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1224 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-7101TE) vs VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101TE) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2675QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-7101TE launched at $117 MSRP, while the Core i7-2675QM debuted at $378.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-69% | $378 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7101TE and Core i7-2675QM
