
Core i3-7101TE

Core i5-7260U
Core i3-7101TE vs Core i5-7260U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7101TE vs Core i5-7260U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7101TE vs Core i5-7260U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7101TE
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i5-7260U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Core i5-7260U
2017Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7101TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,953 vs 3,956).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-7101TE better than Core i5-7260U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7101TE vs Core i5-7260U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7101TE
The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i5-7260U
The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-7101TE and Core i5-7260U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-7101TE scores 3,956 against the Core i5-7260U's 3,953 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-7101TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,188 vs 1,192, a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-7260U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7101TE vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7260U.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i5-7260U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,956 | 3,953 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,188 | 1,192 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,368 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7101TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101TE versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7260U — the Core i3-7101TE supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7101TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7101TE) vs 12 (Core i5-7260U) — the Core i3-7101TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170,B250,H270,Z270 (Core i3-7101TE) and Kaby Lake-U (Core i5-7260U).
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i5-7260U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+13% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-7101TE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7260U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101TE) and Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i5-7260U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Core i5-7260U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














