Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-7101TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-7101TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-7101TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5095

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7101TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-7101TE

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Celeron N5095 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,956 vs 4,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Celeron N5095 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2233.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5095 better than Core i3-7101TE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-7101TE is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5095 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Celeron N5095 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5095 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5095 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N5095 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. Core i3-7101TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (33.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5095 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-7101TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-7101TE

The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7101TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5095 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101TE (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron N5095 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-7101TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095 scores 4,013 against the Core i3-7101TE's 3,956 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron N5095. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N5095 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101TE.

Feature	Celeron N5095	Core i3-7101TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,013+1%	3,956
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,188
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,368

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-7101TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N5095	Core i3-7101TE
Socket	BGA1338	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095) / Yes (Core i3-7101TE). The Core i3-7101TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Celeron N5095 requires a dedicated GPU.