Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7101TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7101TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7101TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6098P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

Core i3-7101TE

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-6098P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,956 vs 3,978).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6098P better than Core i3-7101TE?

Yes. Core i3-6098P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-6098P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6098P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6098P is the better buy right now. Core i3-6098P comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $117 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.6% better value on MSRP (34.0 vs 33.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7101TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7101TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6098P

The Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,978 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-7101TE

The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6098P and Core i3-7101TE share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-6098P versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-6098P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-6098P uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7101TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6098P scores 3,978 against the Core i3-7101TE's 3,956 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-6098P. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7101TE
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,978	3,956
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,188
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,368

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Core i3-6098P versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101TE — the Core i3-7101TE supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7101TE
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i3-6098P) vs Yes (Core i3-7101TE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 510 (Core i3-6098P) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7101TE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 510	Intel HD Graphics 630
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	true	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6098P was priced at $117, while the Core i3-7101TE came in at $117. On launch pricing ($117 vs $117), Core i3-7101TE was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6098P delivers 34.0 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-7101TE — making the Core i3-6098P the 0.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7101TE
MSRP	$117	$117
Performance per Dollar	34.0	33.8
Release Date	2015	2017

Search Core i3-6098P on Amazon

Search Core i3-7101TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.