PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-8145UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-8145UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6098P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $164 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 137.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.0 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,978 vs 4,021).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.

Core i3-8145UE

2018

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-6098P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 34.0 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8145UE better than Core i3-6098P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-6098P is ahead with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8145UE pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Core i3-8145UE also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8145UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8145UE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-8145UE comes in 140.2% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. Core i3-6098P only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 137.6% better value on paper (34.0 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8145UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-8145UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6098P

The Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,978 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-8145UE

The Core i3-8145UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,021 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6098P and Core i3-8145UE share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-6098P versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8145UE — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i3-8145UE (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-6098P uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-8145UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6098P scores 3,978 against the Core i3-8145UE's 4,021 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-8145UE. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6098P vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8145UE.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-8145UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	3,978	4,021+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	2,356
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,218
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,356

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6098P uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-8145UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Core i3-6098P versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8145UE — the Core i3-8145UE supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-8145UE
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i3-6098P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8145UE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 510 (Core i3-6098P) and UHD 620 (Core i3-8145UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8145UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8145UE rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-8145UE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 510	UHD 620
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6098P was priced at $117, while the Core i3-8145UE came in at $281. On launch pricing ($117 vs $281), Core i3-6098P was $164 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6098P delivers 34.0 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-8145UE — making the Core i3-6098P the 81.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-8145UE
MSRP	$117-58%	$281
Performance per Dollar	34.0+138%	14.3
Release Date	2015	2018

Search Core i3-6098P on Amazon

Search Core i3-8145UE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.