
Core i3-6098P

Opteron 6212
Core i3-6098P vs Opteron 6212 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-6098P vs Opteron 6212 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-6098P vs Opteron 6212: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-6098P
2015Why buy it
- β +0.1% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $149 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
- β Delivers 127.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.0 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
- β Draws 54W instead of 115W, a 61W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6212 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6212, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
Opteron 6212
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (3,973 vs 3,978).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 34.0 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- β113% higher power demand at 115W vs 54W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-6098P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-6098P better than Opteron 6212?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-6098P vs Opteron 6212 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6098P
The Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015β2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,978 points. Launch price was $117.

Opteron 6212
The Opteron 6212 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011β2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,973 points. Launch price was $266.
Processing Power
The Core i3-6098P packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6212 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the Opteron 6212 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-6098P versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6212 β a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-6098P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-6098P uses the Skylake (2015β2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6212 uses Interlagos (2011β2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6098P scores 3,978 against the Opteron 6212's 3,973 β a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-6098P. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6098P vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6212.
| Feature | Core i3-6098P | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015β2016) | Interlagos (2011β2012) |
| PassMark | 3,978 | 3,973 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-6098P uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6212 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-6098P | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i3-6098P) / not specified (Opteron 6212). The Core i3-6098P includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Opteron 6212 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-6098P | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 510 | β |
| Virtualization | true | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-6098P was priced at $117, while the Opteron 6212 came in at $266. On launch pricing ($117 vs $266), Core i3-6098P was $149 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6098P delivers 34.0 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Opteron 6212 β making the Core i3-6098P the 77.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-6098P | Opteron 6212 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-56% | $266 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.0+128% | 14.9 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















