Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7130U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7130U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7130U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6098P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,978 vs 4,055).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Core i3-7130U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.

Core i3-7130U

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-6098P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7130U better than Core i3-6098P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-6098P is ahead with a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7130U pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7130U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7130U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-7130U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. Core i3-6098P only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7130U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6098P vs Core i3-7130U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6098P

The Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,978 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-7130U

The Core i3-7130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,055 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6098P and Core i3-7130U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-6098P versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-7130U — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-6098P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-6098P uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7130U uses Kaby Lake-U (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6098P scores 3,978 against the Core i3-7130U's 4,055 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i3-7130U. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7130U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaby Lake-U (2017)
PassMark	3,978	4,055+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6098P uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7130U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 2133 memory speed. The Core i3-6098P supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-6098P) vs 12 (Core i3-7130U) — the Core i3-6098P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7130U
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i3-6098P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7130U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 510 (Core i3-6098P) and HD Graphics 620 (Core i3-7130U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7130U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7130U rivals Ryzen 3 3250U.

Feature	Core i3-6098P	Core i3-7130U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 510	HD Graphics 620
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Mainstream Laptop