Celeron N5105
VS
Core i3-7101TE

Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-7101TE

Intel

Celeron N5105

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i3-7101TE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9220%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8712%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6325%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1906%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1509%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1320%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
756%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
746%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
680%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
680%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
672%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
654%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
645%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
642%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
636%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
97%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
98%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
97%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
96%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
100%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
100%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
98%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
97%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
97%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
97%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
96%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-7101TE leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N5105 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N5105Core i3-7101TE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N5105Core i3-7101TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5105 and Core i3-7101TE

Intel

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-7101TE

The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.

Processing Power

The Celeron N5105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7101TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101TE (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron N5105 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-7101TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Core i3-7101TE's 3,956 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron N5105. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101TE.

FeatureCeleron N5105Core i3-7101TE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB (total)+200%
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,003+1%
3,956
Geekbench 6 Single
1,188
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,368
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5105 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-7101TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5105Core i3-7101TE
Socket
BGA1338
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5105) / Yes (Core i3-7101TE). The Core i3-7101TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Celeron N5105 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron N5105Core i3-7101TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes