
Core i3-7101TE

Opteron 4334
Core i3-7101TE vs Opteron 4334 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7101TE vs Opteron 4334 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7101TE vs Opteron 4334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7101TE
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $204 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $204 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4334, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
Opteron 4334
2012Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,949 vs 3,956).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($204 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7101TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-7101TE better than Opteron 4334?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7101TE vs Opteron 4334 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7101TE
The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.

Opteron 4334
The Opteron 4334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,949 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7101TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4334 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 4334 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 4334 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 4334 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-7101TE uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 4334 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7101TE scores 3,956 against the Opteron 4334's 3,949 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-7101TE. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7101TE vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4334.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Opteron 4334 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 8192 kB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 6144 kB+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Seoul (2012) |
| PassMark | 3,956 | 3,949 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,188 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,368 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7101TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4334 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Opteron 4334 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | C32 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-7101TE) / not specified (Opteron 4334). The Core i3-7101TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 4334 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Opteron 4334 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-7101TE was priced at $117, while the Opteron 4334 came in at $204. On launch pricing ($117 vs $204), Core i3-7101TE was $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7101TE delivers 33.8 pts/$ vs 19.4 pts/$ for the Opteron 4334 — making the Core i3-7101TE the 54.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-7101TE | Opteron 4334 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-43% | $204 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8+74% | 19.4 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















