
Core i5-3330S

Core i7-2675QM
Core i5-3330S vs Core i7-2675QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3330S vs Core i7-2675QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3330S vs Core i7-2675QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3330S
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $147 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2675QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌71.1% higher power demand at 77W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2675QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2675QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 77W, a 32W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-3330S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,915).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3330S better than Core i7-2675QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3330S vs Core i7-2675QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3330S
The Core i5-3330S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,915 points. Launch price was $231.

Core i7-2675QM
The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3330S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2675QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3330S versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3330S (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-3330S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2675QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3330S scores 3,915 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-3330S. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-3330S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+23% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,915 | 3,913 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3330S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3330S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1224 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3330S) / VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). The Core i7-2675QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-3330S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-3330S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3330S was priced at $231, while the Core i7-2675QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($231 vs $378), Core i5-3330S was $147 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3330S delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-2675QM — making the Core i5-3330S the 48.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3330S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $231-39% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+62% | 10.4 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















