Core i5-3330S vs Xeon E3-1225

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3330S vs Xeon E3-1225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3330S vs Xeon E3-1225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3330S

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 77W instead of 95W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
3.1% HIGHER MSRP
$231 MSRPvs$224 MSRP

Xeon E3-1225

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,903 vs 3,915).
❌23.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 77W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3330S better than Xeon E3-1225?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3330S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3330S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3330S is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1225 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-3330S comes in 3.1% more expensive on MSRP at $231 MSRP versus $224 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1225 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1225 is also 2.8% better value on MSRP (17.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3330S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3330S vs Xeon E3-1225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3330S

The Core i5-3330S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,915 points. Launch price was $231.

Xeon E3-1225

The Xeon E3-1225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,903 points. Launch price was $150.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-3330S and Xeon E3-1225 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3330S versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1225 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-3330S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3330S scores 3,915 against the Xeon E3-1225's 3,903 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-3330S. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-3330S	Xeon E3-1225
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.1 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,915	3,903

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i5-3330S	Xeon E3-1225
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3330S was priced at $231, while the Xeon E3-1225 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($231 vs $224), Xeon E3-1225 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3330S delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 — making the Xeon E3-1225 the 2.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-3330S	Xeon E3-1225
MSRP	$231	$224-3%
Performance per Dollar	16.9	17.4+3%
Release Date	2012	2011

Search Core i5-3330S on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1225 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.