Core i5-3330S vs Opteron 4334

Intel

Core i5-3330S

4 Cores4 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 4334

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-3330S vs Opteron 4334 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3330S vs Opteron 4334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3330S vs Opteron 4334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3330S

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 77W instead of 95W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,915 vs 3,949).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4334, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($231 MSRP vs $204 MSRP).

Opteron 4334

2012

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
  • Costs $27 less on MSRP ($204 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).
  • Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($204 MSRP vs $231 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 23.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 77W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 4334 better than Core i5-3330S?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4334 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3330S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 4334 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 4334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 4334 is the better buy right now. Opteron 4334 comes in $27 cheaper on MSRP at $204 MSRP versus $231 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.2% better value on MSRP (19.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Opteron 4334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3330S vs Opteron 4334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-3330S

The Core i5-3330S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,915 points. Launch price was $231.

AMD

Opteron 4334

The Opteron 4334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,949 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3330S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4334 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 4334 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-3330S versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 4334 — a 9% clock advantage for the Opteron 4334 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-3330S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 4334 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3330S scores 3,915 against the Opteron 4334's 3,949 — a 0.9% lead for the Opteron 4334. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3330S vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4334.

FeatureCore i5-3330SOpteron 4334
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.1 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
6144 kB+2300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Seoul (2012)
PassMark
3,915
3,949
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3330S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4334 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3330SOpteron 4334
Socket
LGA1155
C32
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3330S was priced at $231, while the Opteron 4334 came in at $204. On launch pricing ($231 vs $204), Opteron 4334 was $27 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3330S delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 19.4 pts/$ for the Opteron 4334 — making the Opteron 4334 the 13.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3330SOpteron 4334
MSRP
$231
$204-12%
Performance per Dollar
16.9
19.4+15%
Release Date
2012
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.