
Core i5-3340S
Popular choices:

Core i7-2675QM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-3340S
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2675QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2675QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-3340S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3340S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,962).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
Core i5-3340S
2013Core i7-2675QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-3340S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2675QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3340S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,962).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3340S better than Core i7-2675QM?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3340S and Core i7-2675QM

Core i5-3340S
Core i5-3340S
The Core i5-3340S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,962 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3340S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2675QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340S versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340S (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-2675QM is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3340S scores 3,962 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-3340S. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340S vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM.
| Feature | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+6% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | — | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 3,962+1% | 3,913 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3340S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1224 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3340S) / VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). The Core i7-2675QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-3340S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-3340S launched at $182 MSRP, while the Core i7-2675QM debuted at $378. On MSRP ($182 vs $378), the Core i5-3340S is $196 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3340S delivers 21.8 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-2675QM — making the Core i5-3340S the 71.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3340S | Core i7-2675QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-52% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.8+110% | 10.4 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













