Core i5-3340S vs Core i7-2675QM

Intel

Core i5-3340S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-2675QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-3340S vs Core i7-2675QM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3340S vs Core i7-2675QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3340S vs Core i7-2675QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3340S

2013

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $196 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 110.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2675QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2675QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-2675QM

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-3340S needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,913 vs 3,962).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340S better than Core i7-2675QM?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2675QM is ahead with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340S pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340S is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-3340S is the better buy right now. Core i5-3340S comes in $196 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-2675QM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 110.3% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3340S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3340S vs Core i7-2675QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-3340S

The Core i5-3340S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,962 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2675QM

The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3340S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2675QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340S versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340S (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-2675QM is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3340S scores 3,962 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-3340S. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340S vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM.

FeatureCore i5-3340SCore i7-2675QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+6%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+27%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,962+1%
3,913
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3340S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3340SCore i7-2675QM
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3340S) / VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). The Core i7-2675QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-3340S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-3340SCore i7-2675QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3340S was priced at $182, while the Core i7-2675QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($182 vs $378), Core i5-3340S was $196 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3340S delivers 21.8 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-2675QM — making the Core i5-3340S the 71.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3340SCore i7-2675QM
MSRP
$182-52%
$378
Performance per Dollar
21.8+110%
10.4
Release Date
2013
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.