Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 4334

Intel

Core i5-3340S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 4334

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 4334 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 4334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 4334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3340S

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $22 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $204 MSRP).
  • Delivers 12.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $204 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4334, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.

Opteron 4334

2012

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,949 vs 3,962).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($204 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340S better than Opteron 4334?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4334 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3340S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-3340S is the better buy right now. Core i5-3340S comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $204 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 4334 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 12.5% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 19.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3340S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 4334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-3340S

The Core i5-3340S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,962 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron 4334

The Opteron 4334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,949 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3340S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4334 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 4334 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340S versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 4334 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Opteron 4334 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Opteron 4334 is built on the Seoul (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3340S scores 3,962 against the Opteron 4334's 3,949 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-3340S. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340S vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4334.

FeatureCore i5-3340SOpteron 4334
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
6144 kB
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Seoul (2012)
PassMark
3,962
3,949
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3340S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4334 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3340SOpteron 4334
Socket
LGA1155
C32
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3340S was priced at $182, while the Opteron 4334 came in at $204. On launch pricing ($182 vs $204), Core i5-3340S was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3340S delivers 21.8 pts/$ vs 19.4 pts/$ for the Opteron 4334 — making the Core i5-3340S the 11.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3340SOpteron 4334
MSRP
$182-11%
$204
Performance per Dollar
21.8+12%
19.4
Release Date
2013
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.