Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 6212

Intel

Core i5-3340S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 6212

8 Cores8 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 6212 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 6212 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 6212: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3340S

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $84 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6212 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,962 vs 3,973).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6212, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Opteron 6212

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
  • 76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6212 better than Core i5-3340S?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6212 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3340S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6212 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6212 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 6212 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 6212 comes in 46.2% more expensive on MSRP at $266 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3340S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 45.7% better value on paper (21.8 vs 14.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3340S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3340S vs Opteron 6212 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-3340S

The Core i5-3340S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,962 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron 6212

The Opteron 6212 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,973 points. Launch price was $266.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3340S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6212 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6212 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340S versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6212 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340S (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Opteron 6212 is built on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3340S scores 3,962 against the Opteron 6212's 3,973 — a 0.3% lead for the Opteron 6212. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340S vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6212.

FeatureCore i5-3340SOpteron 6212
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,962
3,973
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3340S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6212 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3340SOpteron 6212
Socket
LGA1155
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3340S was priced at $182, while the Opteron 6212 came in at $266. On launch pricing ($182 vs $266), Core i5-3340S was $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3340S delivers 21.8 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Opteron 6212 — making the Core i5-3340S the 37.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3340SOpteron 6212
MSRP
$182-32%
$266
Performance per Dollar
21.8+46%
14.9
Release Date
2013
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.