Quadro 1100M vs GeForce GT 340
Quadro 1100M
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 1100M is positioned at rank 165 and the GeForce GT 340 is on rank 170, so the Quadro 1100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 1100M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 340
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 1100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 340.
| Insight | Quadro 1100M | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 1100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 1100M and GeForce GT 340
Quadro 1100M
The Quadro 1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 755 points. Launch price was $109.94.
GeForce GT 340
The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 1100M scores 755 and the GeForce GT 340 reaches 738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 1100M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 340 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 1100M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 340). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro 1100M) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340).
| Feature | Quadro 1100M | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 755+2% | 738 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5422 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+41% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 1100M | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 1100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB. The Quadro 1100M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 1100M | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 1100M draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 340's 64W — a 34.9% difference. The Quadro 1100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 1100M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 1100M | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-30% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.8+46% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 340 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 1100M | GeForce GT 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #856 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 1100M and GeForce GT 340
