Quadro 1100M vs Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA

Quadro 1100M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1098 MHz
Similar parts
···

Quadro 1100M vs Quadro 2000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 1100M vs Quadro 2000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 1100M vs Quadro 2000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 1100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 2000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 62.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (758 vs 755), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 1100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 2000M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 1100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 1100M vs Quadro 2000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 1100M

The Quadro 1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 755 points. Launch price was $109.94.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000M

The Quadro 2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 758 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 1100M scores 755 and the Quadro 2000M reaches 758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 1100M is built on Kepler while the Quadro 2000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 1100M) vs 640 (Quadro 2000M). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro 1100M) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000M).

FeatureQuadro 1100MQuadro 2000M
G3D Mark Score
755
758
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5422 TFLOPS
1.405 TFLOPS+159%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
320 KB+900%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 1100MQuadro 2000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 1100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000M carries 2 GB. Quadro 1100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 1100M and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro 1100M) vs 2 MB (Quadro 2000M) — the Quadro 2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 1100MQuadro 2000M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 1100M draws 45W versus the Quadro 2000M's 55W — a 20% difference. The Quadro 1100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 1100M) vs 350W (Quadro 2000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro 1100MQuadro 2000M
TDP
45W-18%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
16.8+22%
13.8