Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro P2200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro P2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro P2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 2500M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅1218.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅900% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Quadro FX 2500M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P2200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P2200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1218.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4205.5% in PassMark G3D (9,386 vs 218), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 5 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro P2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 2500M

The Quadro FX 2500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 218 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 2500M scores 218 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 4205.5%. The Quadro FX 2500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200).

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Quadro P2200
G3D Mark Score	218	9,386+4206%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	55 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	3.822 TFLOPS+514%
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.25 MB+400%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Quadro P2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 2500M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 carries 5 GB. Quadro P2200 gives you 900% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2500M and 256-bit on the Quadro P2200. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Quadro P2200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	5 GB+900%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.25 MB+400%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2500M draws 189W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Quadro P2200
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	201mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	1.2	125.1+10325%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P2200 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Quadro P2200
MSRP	—	$429
Codename	GT200B	GP106
Release	November 11 2008	June 10 2019
Ranking	#815	#281

Search Quadro FX 2500M on Amazon

Search Quadro P2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.