Quadro FX 2500M vs Radeon E6465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 2500M is positioned at rank #282 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2500M

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

97%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

95%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

92%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

91%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

90%

#267

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

6777%

#282

Quadro FX 2500M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

98%

#285

GRID P4-2Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235

97%

#287

Tesla C2070

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38

95%

#289

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

95%

#290

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

94%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

93%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

91%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

90%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon E6465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 2500M.

Insight	Quadro FX 2500M	Radeon E6465
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon E6465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 2500M Benchmark Check

Radeon E6465 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2500M and Radeon E6465

Quadro FX 2500M

The Quadro FX 2500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 218 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 2500M scores 218 versus the Radeon E6465's 231 — the Radeon E6465 leads by 6%. The Quadro FX 2500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Radeon E6465
G3D Mark Score	218	231+6%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Radeon E6465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 2500M	Radeon E6465
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2500M draws 189W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.